Backers of the Orphan Works bill are circulating their Talking Points:
Neither the House nor the Senate drafts of the bill contain the word registries, [they write] but rather they require users to search non-governmental databases of copyrighted works. The purpose of any database is not meant to take the place of copyright registration, but to have a way to search for visual images. Any participation in such a database would be voluntary.
But this doesnt mean what it appears to say. Take it point by point:
Talking Point #1: Neither the House nor the Senate drafts of the bill contain the word registries. Response: Correct. They contain the word databases, a synonym:
Registry: register: an official written record of names or events or transactions [link]
Database: A database is a structured collection of records or data [link]
Q: Why a synonym? A: Because international copyright law forbids member countries to impose registries as a condition of protecting copyrights: Berne/Article 5(2) The enjoyment and the exercise of these rights shall not be subject to any formality. [link]
In other words, if they used the word registries in the bills, it would be a red flag to other countries that the US is flirting with non-compliance with international treaties.
Talking Point #2: ...rather they [the bills] require users to search non-governmental databases of copyrighted works. Response: Non-governmental databases means databases maintained in the private sector. For users to find your work in these commercial databases, your work would first have to be in the database. Work not in the database would be orphaned.
Talking Point #3: Any participation in such a database would be voluntary. Response: Congress cannot pass a bill making registration mandatory because that would violate Berne/Article 5(2). And that would state explicitly to other countries that the US no longer intends to honor its international agreements. There are red flags all over these talking points.
Summing up: The Orphan Work bills would mandate the creation of registries by commercial interests. You would not be legally forced to place your work with these for-profit registries. But failure to do so would orphan your work.
The deceptive talking points accompanying this bill are another red flag.
Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner, for the Board of the Illustrators Partnership
--
-Doc Redfield (dA Gallery: [link]) "Nothing is Impossible... until proven otherwise." Scott P. 'Doc' Vaughn's site: [link] Official Hero-Lore site: [link]
Devious Comments
Backers of the Orphan Works bill are circulating their Talking Points:
Neither the House nor the Senate drafts of the bill contain the word registries, [they write] but rather they require users to search non-governmental databases of copyrighted works. The purpose of any database is not meant to take the place of copyright registration, but to have a way to search for visual images. Any participation in such a database would be voluntary.
But this doesnt mean what it appears to say. Take it point by point:
Talking Point #1: Neither the House nor the Senate drafts of the bill contain the word registries.
Response: Correct. They contain the word databases, a synonym:
Registry: register: an official written record of names or events or transactions
[link]
Database: A database is a structured collection of records or data
[link]
Q: Why a synonym?
A: Because international copyright law forbids member countries to impose registries as a condition of protecting copyrights: Berne/Article 5(2) The enjoyment and the exercise of these rights shall not be subject to any formality. [link]
In other words, if they used the word registries in the bills, it would be a red flag to other countries that the US is flirting with non-compliance with international treaties.
Talking Point #2: ...rather they [the bills] require users to search non-governmental databases of copyrighted works.
Response: Non-governmental databases means databases maintained in the private sector.
For users to find your work in these commercial databases, your work would first have to be in the database.
Work not in the database would be orphaned.
Talking Point #3: Any participation in such a database would be voluntary.
Response: Congress cannot pass a bill making registration mandatory because that would violate Berne/Article 5(2).
And that would state explicitly to other countries that the US no longer intends to honor its international agreements.
There are red flags all over these talking points.
Summing up: The Orphan Work bills would mandate the creation of registries by commercial interests.
You would not be legally forced to place your work with these for-profit registries.
But failure to do so would orphan your work.
The deceptive talking points accompanying this bill are another red flag.
Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner, for the Board of the Illustrators Partnership
Thanks for the
Glad you enjoyed my art!
Redpill
--
The Moral of the Story is that:
Bands with NO talent CAN easily amuse
Idiots, with a stupid Puppet Show.
v
--
The Moral of the Story is that:
Bands with NO talent CAN easily amuse
Idiots, with a stupid Puppet Show.
and thanks for the comment on the pic.
vesha
--
-Doc Redfield (dA Gallery: [link])
"Nothing is Impossible... until proven otherwise."
Scott P. 'Doc' Vaughn's site: [link]
Official Hero-Lore site: [link]
I'll be adding more varied stuff in the near future.
CHEERS
vesha
--
LOVE & BEER
Previous PageNext Page